Regulation 2016/2030 - Amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as regards the secretariat of the Supervisory Committee of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2016/2030 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as regards the secretariat of the Supervisory Committee of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)| Legal instrument | Regulation |
|---|---|
| Number legal act | Regulation 2016/2030 |
| Original proposal | COM(2016)113  |
| CELEX number i | 32016R2030 |
| Document | 26-10-2016; Date of signature |
|---|---|
| Publication in Official Journal | 23-11-2016; OJ L 317 p. 1-3 |
| Signature | 26-10-2016 |
| Effect | 01-12-2016; Entry into force See Art 2 01-01-2017; Application See Art 2 |
| End of validity | 31-12-9999 |
23.11.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 317/1 |
REGULATION (EU, Euratom) 2016/2030 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 26 October 2016
amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as regards the secretariat of the Supervisory Committee of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 325 thereof,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the Court of Auditors (1),
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2),
Whereas:
(1) |
In accordance with Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3), the Supervisory Committee of the European Anti-Fraud Office (‘the Office’) is tasked with regularly monitoring the implementation by the Office of its investigative function, in order to reinforce the Office's independence. |
(2) |
The framework for the implementation of the budgetary appropriations relating to the members of the Supervisory Committee should be set up in a way that avoids any appearance of a possible interference of the Office in their duties. Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 should be adapted in order to allow for such a framework, while guaranteeing the same transparency of the appropriations for the operation of the Supervisory Committee as before. |
(3) |
In order to ensure that the Supervisory Committee functions effectively and efficiently, its secretariat should be provided directly by the Commission, independently from the Office, and the Commission should provide the secretariat with appropriate means to fulfil its function. In order to safeguard the Supervisory Committee's independence, the Commission should refrain from interfering with the monitoring functions of the Supervisory Committee. |
(4) |
Where the Office appoints a Data Protection Officer in accordance with Article 10(4) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, that Data Protection Officer should continue to be competent for the processing of data by the secretariat of the Supervisory Committee. |
(5) |
Confidentiality obligations for the staff of the secretariat of the Supervisory Committee should continue to apply. |
(6) |
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) and on 18 March 2016 decided not to issue any opinion, |
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 is amended as follows:
(1) |
Article 10 is amended as follows:
|
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.