Decision 2005/91 - 2005/91/EC: Commission Decision of 2 February 2005 establishing the period after which the anti-rabies vaccination is considered as valid (notified under document number C(2005) 190)

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

1.

Current status

This decision was in effect from February  2, 2005 until December 28, 2014.

2.

Key information

official title

2005/91/EC: Commission Decision of 2 February 2005 establishing the period after which the anti-rabies vaccination is considered as valid (notified under document number C(2005) 190)
 
Legal instrument Decision
Number legal act Decision 2005/91
CELEX number i 32005D0091

3.

Key dates

Document 02-02-2005
Publication in Official Journal 18-10-2005; Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 03 Volume 030,Special edition in Romanian: Chapter 03 Volume 062,OJ L 31, 4.2.2005,Special edition in Bulgarian: Chapter 03 Volume 062,OJ L 272M , 18.10.2005
Effect 02-02-2005; Entry into force Date notif.
07-02-2005; Application See Art 2
End of validity 28-12-2014; Repealed by 32013R0577
Notification 02-02-2005

4.

Legislative text

4.2.2005   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/61

 

COMMISSION DECISION

of 2 February 2005

establishing the period after which the anti-rabies vaccination is considered as valid

(notified under document number C(2005) 190)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2005/91/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC (1), and in particular Article 20 thereof,

Whereas:

 

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 lays down the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movements of dogs, cats and ferrets and the rules applicable to checks on such movements.

 

(2)

That Regulation provides that the pet animal must be accompanied by a passport certifying that it has undergone a valid anti-rabies vaccination, or revaccination (booster) if applicable, in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturing laboratory.

 

(3)

The recommendations of the producer of the vaccination state clearly the end of the immunity period and the date before which the revaccination (booster) has to be carried out.

 

(4)

Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 does not lay down the period necessary for the establishment of the immunity against rabies. In the interests of clarity of Community legislation, it is appropriate to provide for a time period after which the anti-rabies vaccination or revaccination (booster) should be considered as valid.

 

(5)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Without prejudice to the requirements laid down in Articles 6 and 8 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003, for the purpose of Article 5(1)(b) of that Regulation, an anti-rabies vaccination shall be considered as valid 21 days from the date of completion of the vaccination protocol required by the manufacturer for the primary vaccination in the country in which the vaccination is administred.

However, the anti-rabies vaccination shall be considered as valid from the date of revaccination (booster) where the vaccine is administered within the period of validity indicated by the manufacturer of a previous vaccination in the country in which the previous vaccination was administered. The vaccination shall be considered as a primary vaccination in the absence of veterinary certification attesting the previous vaccination.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 7 February 2005.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 February 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU

Member of the Commission

 

 


More

This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.

 

5.

Sources and disclaimer

For further information you may want to consult the following sources that have been used to compile this dossier:

This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.

 

6.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

7.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.