Annexes to JAI(2008)3 - Initiative of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia and Sweden with a view to adopting a Council Decision of … on the strengthening of Eurojust

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

dossier JAI(2008)3 - Initiative of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, ...
document JAI(2008)3
date December 16, 2008
Annex thereto. However, once the Council Decision establishing the European Police Office (Europol) enters into force, the competence of Eurojust will be as set out in Article 4(1) of that Decision and in the Annex thereto.

(8) OJ L 162, 20.6.2002, p. 1.’;

(9) OJ L 167, 26.6.2002, p. 1.

(10) OJ L 332, 18.12.2007, p. 103.

(11) OJ L 301, 12.11.2008, p. 38.’;

(12) OJ L 253, 29.9.2005, p. 22.’;

(13) OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 54.’;

(14) OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 130.’;

(15) Council Decision 2000/641/JHA of 17 October 2000 establishing a secretariat for the joint supervisory data-protection bodies set up by the Convention on the Establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention), the Convention on the Use of Information Technology for Customs Purposes and the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement on the gradual abolition of checks at the common borders (Schengen Convention) (OJ L 271, 24.10.2000, p. 1).’;

(16) OJ L 136, 31.5.1999, p. 8.’;

(17) OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

(18) OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1.’;

(19) OJ L 101, 11.4.2001, p. 1.’;


ANNEX

‘ANNEX

List referred to in Article 13(10) setting out the minimum types of information to be transmitted, where available, to Eurojust pursuant to Article 13(5), (6) and (7)

1.For situations referred to in Article 13(5):

(a)participating Member States;

(b)type of offences concerned;

(c)date of the agreement setting up the team;

(d)planned duration of the team, including modification of this duration;

(e)details of the leader of the team for each participating Member State;

(f)short summary of the results of the joint investigation teams.

2.For situations referred to in Article 13(6):

(a)data which identify the person, group or entity that is the object of a criminal investigation or prosecution;

(b)Member States concerned;

(c)the offence concerned and its circumstances;

(d)data related to the requests for, or decisions on, judicial cooperation including regarding instruments giving effect to the principle of mutual recognition, which are issued, including:

(i)date of the request;

(ii)requesting or issuing authority;

(iii)requested or executing authority;

(iv)type of request (measures requested);

(v)whether or not the request has been executed, and if not on what grounds.

3.For situations referred to in Article 13(7)(a):

(a)Member States and competent authorities concerned;

(b)data which identify the person, group or entity that is the object of a criminal investigation or prosecution;

(c)the offence concerned and its circumstances.

4.For situations referred to in Article 13(7)(b):

(a)Member States and competent authorities concerned;

(b)data which identify the person, group or entity that is the object of a criminal investigation or prosecution;

(c)type of delivery;

(d)type of offence in connection with which the controlled delivery is carried out.

5.For situations referred to in Article 13(7)(c):

(a)requesting or issuing State;

(b)requested or executing State;

(c)description of the difficulties.’