Annexes to COM(2002)22 - Amendment of Council Directive 96/48/EC and Directive 2001/16/EC on the interoperability of the trans-European rail system - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
dossier | COM(2002)22 - Amendment of Council Directive 96/48/EC and Directive 2001/16/EC on the interoperability of the trans-European rail system. |
---|---|
document | COM(2002)22 |
date | April 29, 2004 |
"ANNEX I
THE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM
1. THE INFRASTRUCTURE
The infrastructure of the trans-European high-speed rail system shall be that of the lines of the trans-European transport network identified in Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (1) or listed in any update of that Decision as a result of the revision provided for in Article 21 of that Decision.
The high-speed lines shall comprise:
— | specially built high-speed lines equipped for speeds generally equal to or greater than 250 km/h, |
— | specially upgraded high-speed lines equipped for speeds of the order of 200 km/h, |
— | specially upgraded high-speed lines which have special features as a result of topographical, relief or town-planning constraints, on which the speed must be adapted to each case. |
This infrastructure includes traffic management, tracking and navigation systems: technical installations for data processing and telecommunications intended for passenger services on these lines in order to guarantee the safe and harmonious operation of the network and efficient traffic management.
2. THE ROLLING STOCK
The rolling stock referred to in this Directive shall comprise trains designed to operate:
— | either at speeds of at least 250 km/h on lines specially built for high speeds, while enabling operation at speeds exceeding 300 km/h in appropriate circumstances, |
— | or at speeds of the order of 200 km/h on the lines of section 1, where compatible with the performance levels of these lines. |
3. COMPATIBILITY OF THE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM
The quality of rail services in Europe depends, inter alia, on excellent compatibility between the characteristics of the infrastructure (in the broadest sense, i.e. the fixed parts of all the subsystems concerned) and those of the rolling stock (including the onboard components of all the subsystems concerned). Performance levels, safety, quality of service and cost depend upon that compatibility.
ANNEX II
"ANNEX II
SUBSYSTEMS
1. LIST OF SUBSYSTEMS
For the purposes of this Directive, the system constituting the trans-European high-speed rail system may be broken down into the following subsystems:
(a) | either structural areas:
|
(b) | or operational areas:
|
2. AREAS TO BE COVERED
For each subsystem, the list of aspects relating to interoperability is indicated in the mandates for drawing up TSIs given to the Agency.
Under Article 6(1), these mandates shall be established in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 21(2).
Where necessary, the list of aspects relating to interoperability indicated in the mandates is specified by the Agency in accordance with Article 5(3)(c)."
ANNEX III
"Annex I
THE TRANS-EUROPEAN CONVENTIONAL RAIL SYSTEM
1. INFRASTRUCTURE
The infrastructure of the trans-European conventional rail system will be that on the lines of the trans-European transport network identified in Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (1) or listed in any update to the same Decision as a result of the revision provided for in Article 21 of that Decision.
For the purposes of this Directive, this network may be subdivided into the following categories:
lines intended for passenger services;
lines intended for mixed traffic (passengers and freight);
lines specially designed or upgraded for freight services;
passenger hubs;
freight hubs, including intermodal terminals;
lines connecting the abovementioned elements.
This infrastructure includes traffic management, tracking, and navigation systems: technical installations for data processing and telecommunications intended for long-distance passenger services and freight services on the network in order to guarantee the safe and harmonious operation of the network and efficient traffic management.
2. ROLLING STOCK
The rolling stock will comprise all the stock likely to travel on all or part of the trans-European conventional rail network, including:
self-propelling thermal or electric trains;
thermal or electric traction units;
passenger carriages;
freight wagons, including rolling stock designed to carry lorries.
Mobile railway infrastructure construction and maintenance equipment is included but is not the first priority.
Each of the above categories is subdivided into:
rolling stock for international use;
rolling stock for national use.
3. COMPATIBILITY OF THE TRANS-EUROPEAN CONVENTIONAL RAILWAY SYSTEM
The quality of rail services in Europe depends, inter alia, on excellent compatibility between the characteristics of the infrastructure (in the broadest sense, i.e. the fixed parts of all the subsystems concerned) and those of the rolling stock (including the onboard components of all the subsystems concerned). Performance levels, safety, quality of service and cost depend upon that compatibility.
4. EXTENSION OF THE SCOPE
1. SUBCATEGORIES OF LINES AND ROLLING STOCK
In order to deliver interoperability cost-effectively further subcategories of all categories of lines and rolling stock mentioned in this Annex will, where necessary, be developed. If necessary, the functional and technical specifications mentioned in Article 5(3) may vary according to the subcategory.
2. COST SAFEGUARDS
The cost-benefit analysis of the proposed measures will take into consideration, among others, the following:
— | cost of the proposed measure, |
— | reduction of capital costs and charges due to economies of scale and better utilisation of rolling stock, |
— | reduction of investment and maintenance/operating costs due to increased competition between manufacturers and maintenance companies, |
— | environmental benefits, due to technical improvements of the rail system, |
— | increase of safety in operation. |
In addition, this assessment will indicate the likely impact for all the operators and economic agents involved.
(1) OJ L 228, 9.9.1996, p. 1. Decision as amended by Decision No 1346/2001/EC (OJ L 185, 6.7.2001, p. 1.)"