Considerations on COM(2006)288 - Authorising Member States to ratify the 2006 Consolidated Maritime Labour Convention of the ILO

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

 
dossier COM(2006)288 - Authorising Member States to ratify the 2006 Consolidated Maritime Labour Convention of the ILO.
document COM(2006)288 EN
date June  7, 2007
 
table>(1)The Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, of the International Labour Organisation (hereinafter referred to as the Convention and the ILO, respectively) was adopted on 7 February 2006 by the maritime session of the International Labour Conference of the ILO convened in Geneva.
(2)The Convention brings a major input in the shipping sector at international level in promoting decent living and working conditions for seafarers and fairer competition conditions for operators and shipowners and it is therefore desirable that its provisions should be applied as soon as possible.

(3)The Convention lays the foundations for an international maritime labour code by setting minimum labour standards.

(4)The Community seeks to achieve the establishment of a level playing field in the maritime industry.

(5)Article 19, paragraph eight of the ILO Constitution states that ‘in no case, shall the adoption of any Convention or Recommendation by the Conference, or the ratification of any Convention by any Member, be deemed to affect any law, award, custom or agreement which ensures more favourable conditions to the workers concerned than those provided for in the Convention or Recommendation’.

(6)Some provisions of the Convention fall within the Community’s exclusive competence as regards the coordination of social security schemes.

(7)The Community cannot ratify the Convention, as only states can be parties thereto.

(8)The Council should therefore authorise the Member States which are bound by the Community rules on the coordination of social security schemes based on Article 42 of the Treaty to ratify the Convention in the interests of the Community, under the conditions laid down in this Decision,