Considerations on COM(2004)400 - Authorisation of the United Kingdom to derogate from Article 11 of the Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

 
dossier COM(2004)400 - Authorisation of the United Kingdom to derogate from Article 11 of the Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of ...
document COM(2004)400 EN
date October 21, 2004
 
table>(1)By letter registered by the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 13 February 2004, the United Kingdom sought authorisation to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 1(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC.
(2)The aim of the derogation is to prevent the avoidance of value added tax (VAT) through the undervaluation of supplies. It is specifically designed to prevent the circumvention of Article 6(2) of Directive 77/388/EEC through the practice, within the motor vehicle trade, of allowing staff the use of cars for a nominal charge. Since that charge appears to be consideration for the supply, VAT is levied under Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC on the actual amount paid by the employee. However, because of the employment ties between the two parties involved, the amount actually paid is artificially low, resulting in significantly smaller VAT revenues.

(3)The United Kingdom has already been granted a request for a derogation from Article 11 designed to tackle the problem of undervalued supplies between connected persons where the recipient of the supply is totally or partially exempt. Since, at the time when that derogation was granted, employees were not included within the definition of ‘connected’ and since an employee is not a taxable person who is totally or partially exempt, a further and more specific derogation is required.

(4)The special measure should apply only in cases where the administration is able to conclude that the taxable amount, as determined in accordance with Article 11(A)(1)(a), has been influenced by the employment ties between the parties involved. That conclusion should, in each case, be based on manifest facts, not presumptions.

(5)Given the limited scope of the derogation, the special measure is proportionate to the aim pursued.

(6)The derogation has no adverse impact on the Communities’ own resources accruing from VAT,