EU authorising Denmark and Sweden to extend the application of a special measure derogating from certain Articles of the VAT Directive - Main contents

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

dossier	COM(2020)328 - Amendment Implementing Decision 2013/680/EU authorising Denmark and Sweden to extend the application of a special measure ...
source	COM(2020)328
date	20-07-2020

1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

Grounds for and objectives of the proposal

Pursuant to Article 395(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax ¹ (hereafter ‘the VAT Directive’) the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to apply special measures for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance.

Denmark and Sweden requested an extension to their existing derogation firstly granted by Decision 2000/91/EC ² and extended by Decisions 2003/65/EC ³ , 2007/132/EC ⁴ and 2013/680/EU ⁵ . In accordance with Article 395(2) of the VAT Directive, the Commission, in a letter dated 2 April 2020, informed the other Member States of the request by Denmark and Sweden. By letter dated 3 April 2020, the Commission notified Denmark and Sweden that it had all the information it considered necessary for the appraisal of the request.

General context

Denmark and Sweden have jointly introduced simplified rules on the recovery of VAT in connection with tolls on the Öresund fixed link between Denmark and Sweden. This was deemed necessary as the normal VAT rules would create excessive paperwork for taxpayers and administrations alike.

Under the normal VAT rules as contained in Articles 168, 169, 170 and 171 of the VAT Directive, VAT must be deducted in or refunded by the Member State in which it was due or paid. As the Öresund fixed link is located partly in the territory of Denmark and partly in the territory of Sweden the VAT paid on the toll charge for using the link would be recoverable from either of these countries to the extent that the charge relates to their territory. Specifically 50% would be recoverable from Denmark and 50% from Sweden.

In practice this would mean that taxable persons established in either Denmark or Sweden would only be able to recover 50% of the VAT on their periodic VAT returns in the Member State of registration. The remaining 50% would have to be claimed back as a refund from the other Member State via Directive 2008/9/EC ⁶ . Also, taxable persons established in Member States other than Denmark and Sweden would be required to recover VAT via two separate refund claims under Directive 2008/9/EC, one submitted to Denmark and the other to Sweden. Likewise, taxable persons established outside the territory of the Union would under Directive 86/560/EEC ⁷ need to send refund claims both to Denmark and to Sweden.

The existing derogation for Denmark and Sweden simplifies the VAT rules concerning the recovery of VAT. In effect, under that derogation, they allow a single claim for the recovery of VAT in relation to the toll. The simplified rules applied are as follows:

– Taxable persons established in Denmark and Sweden are entitled to deduct, on their domestic VAT return, the full amount of deductible VAT on the tolls including that part relating to the use of the link in the territory of the Member State in which they are not established.

– To recover VAT deductible under the procedure laid down in Directive 2008/9/EC regarding taxable persons established in a Member State other than Denmark or Sweden or under the procedure laid down in Directive 86/560/EEC for taxable persons established outside of the Member States, the application should be made to the Swedish authorities only.

Denmark and Sweden request that these existing simplification rules be extended for a further period.

According to the statistical information provided by Sweden, the derogation created for the taxable persons provides a significant simplification of the VAT recovery of the Öresund link tolls, and has proven successful. It is also the Commission's view that this type of cross-border deduction is a model of simplification of business obligations that could be extended through a generalised One Stop Shop in the long term.

The Commission therefore considers that a further extension is appropriate.

Existing provisions in the area of the proposal

An existing derogation granted to Denmark and Sweden on 24 January 2000 and extended on 21 January 2003, on 30 January 2007 and on 13 November 2013.

Consistency with other policies and objectives of the Union

Not applicable.

2. RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Consultation of interested parties

Not relevant.

Collection and use of expertise

There was no need for external expertise.

Impact assessment

The proposed Decision aims at simplifying the procedure for recovery of VAT on tolls for taxable persons using the Öresund fixed link between Denmark and Sweden and therefore potentially has a positive economic impact.

The impact will in any case be limited because of the narrow scope of the derogation.

3. LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL

Summary of the proposed action

Authorisation for Denmark and Sweden to apply a measure derogating from Articles 168, 169, 170 and 171 of the VAT Directive as regards the right of deduction for taxable persons.

Legal basis

Article 395 of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax.

Subsidiarity principle

The proposal falls under the exclusive competence of the Union. The subsidiarity principle therefore does not apply.

Proportionality principle

The proposal complies with the proportionality principle for the following reasons:

This Decision concerns an authorisation granted to two Member States upon their own request and does not constitute any obligation.

Given the limited scope of the derogation, the special measure is proportionate to the aim pursued.

Choice of instruments

Proposed instruments: other.

Other means would not be adequate for the following reasons:

Under Article 395 of the Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, derogation from the common VAT rules is only possible on the authority of the Council acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission. A Council Implementing Decision is the only suitable instrument since it can be addressed to an individual Member State.

4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION

The proposal has no implication for the Union's budget.

5. OPTIONAL ELEMENTS

Review/revision/sunset clause

The proposal includes a sunset clause.