Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2009)101 - Amendment of Decision 2006/325/EC to provide for a procedure for the implementation of Article 5(2) of the Agreement with Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2009)101 - Amendment of Decision 2006/325/EC to provide for a procedure for the implementation of Article 5(2) of the Agreement with ... |
|---|---|
| source | COM(2009)101  |
| date | 04-03-2009 |
1. 1. Grounds for and objectives of the proposal(s) Pursuant to the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in Title IV of the EC Treaty, and as a consequence Community instruments adopted in the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters are not binding upon or applicable in Denmark. However, the application of certain Community instruments has been extended to Denmark by way of the international agreements between the European Community and Denmark concluded on the basis of Article 300 of the EC Treaty. The relevant international agreements, concluded by Council Decisions 2006/325/EC i and 2006/326/EC i respectively, are: the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters i and the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters i. Those parallel agreements provide (in Article 5(2)) for the European Community's agreement to be given in cases where Denmark intends to enter into international agreements which may affect or alter the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (hereinafter: the Brussels I Regulation) i or the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 (hereinafter: the Regulation on the service of documents) i. Neither the Council Decisions on the conclusion of those parallel agreements nor the parallel agreements themselves stipulate how the Community should take a decision on such agreement. The objective of the proposal(s) is to lay down the procedure for the implementation of Article 5 i of both parallel agreements, by amending the Council Decisions on their conclusion.
1.2. General context The parallel agreements provide (in Article 5(1)) that international agreements entered into by the Community based on the relevant Regulations (as annexed to the parallel agreements) are neither binding upon nor applicable in Denmark. Denmark has to refrain from entering into international agreements which may affect or alter the scope of the relevant Regulations, unless it is done in agreement with the Community and satisfactory arrangements have been made with regard to the relationship between those parallel agreements and the international agreement in question. The relations between Denmark and the European Community as regards those parallel agreements are regulated by international law. Article 300 of the EC Treaty applies and the Commission consequently cannot enter into international obligations on behalf of the European Community without being specifically delegated such a right. The Council Decisions concerning conclusion of the parallel agreements and the agreements themselves do not delegate to the Commission the power to give agreement on behalf of the European Community. The European Community therefore has to lay down the specific internal procedure to be followed by the European Community (excluding Denmark) for taking decisions regarding its agreement to the conclusion by Denmark of international agreements affecting the Regulations concerned as annexed to the parallel agreements. For practical reasons the Commission is presenting at the same time two proposals for implementing both parallel agreements. Although it is less likely that Denmark will propose entering into international agreements containing provisions on the service of documents abroad that might affect the parallel agreement on the service of documents, it is necessary to lay down the procedure for implementing this parallel agreement too.
A meeting between representatives of the Danish authorities and the Commission was held in 2008 in order to discuss the situation. No further consultations were held since the question of the internal procedure to be followed by the European Community concerns only the European Community, with the exception of Denmark, given that Denmark does not take part in Title IV of the EC Treaty and in this context is to be regarded as a third country. The Commission evaluated different options for setting up the implementation procedure, although without carrying out a formal impact assessment. One of the options would have consisted of amending both parallel agreements in order to provide for a particular implementation procedure. This would have been a much heavier procedure (need for a negotiating mandate for the Commission, the negotiations themselves and the procedure to be followed for the conclusion of the agreements) and, since the issue urgently requires a solution, this option was not followed. The option chosen by the Commission envisages a simple and relatively swift solution, i.e. amending the Council Decisions on the conclusion of the parallel agreements so as to insert the particular provisions on the procedure to be followed by the European Community for taking decisions regarding its agreement to the conclusion by Denmark of international agreement concerned.
(S) 3.1. Summary of the proposed action The Commission proposes amending Council Decision 2006/325/EC and Council Decision 2006/326/EC in order to insert into those decisions provisions on the implementation of Article 5 i of the parallel agreements. The same procedure is provided for the implementation of both parallel agreements. Two situations are distinguished, and a different procedure for the European Community to give its agreement is laid down for each of those situations. The common denominator in both situations is that the Commission is empowered by the Council to give the agreement on behalf of the European Community. The first situation includes cases where the Member States have already been authorised to conclude the international agreement concerned. This is the case, for example, of the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001 (the Bunkers Convention), where the Community has already authorised its Member States, in the interest of the Community, to sign, ratify or accede to it (see Council Decision 2002/762/EC authorising the Member States, in the interest of the Community, to sign, ratify or accede to the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001 (the Bunkers Convention) i). Another example is the Protocol of 12 February 2004 amending the Paris Convention of 29 July 1960 on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (see Council Decision 2003/882/EC authorising the Member States which are Contracting Parties to the Paris Convention of 29 July 1960 on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy to sign, in the interest of the European Community, the Protocol amending that Convention i and Council Decision 2004/294/EC authorising the Member States which are Contracting Parties to the Paris Convention of 29 July 1960 on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy to ratify, in the interest of the European Community, the Protocol amending that Convention, or to accede to it i). This first situation will also cover cases where the Community has itself become a party to international agreements affecting the Brussels I Regulation or the Regulation on the service of documents. In the cases described, given the fact that the Community has already reviewed the possibility of those Community instruments being affected by the international agreement concerned and has provided, where necessary, for safeguards to ensure that those Community instruments are applied in the relevant cases, a simple procedure is established. In such situations, the Commission will be empowered to give the agreement to Denmark on behalf of the European Community. The second situation covers all cases that do not fall into the first category above. In such cases there is a need to discuss with the Member States the possibility of the Regulations concerned being affected by the international agreement which Denmark intends to conclude. The Member States will therefore be involved in the decision-making process through the comitology procedure. In such situations the Commission will be empowered to give the agreement to Denmark on behalf of the European Community through the comitology procedure. 3.2. Legal basis The legal basis for both proposals is Article 61(c) of the EC Treaty, in conjunction with the first subparagraph of Article 300 i and the first subparagraph of Article 300 i thereof.