Legal provisions of SEC(2008)345 - Commission Opinion under the second paragraph of Article 245 of the EC treaty and the second paragraph of Article 160 of the EAEC Treaty regarding the request to amend the rules of procedure of the Court of Justice on the language arrangements applicable to the review procedure, submitted by the Court, in accordance with Article 64 of the Statute of the Court of Justice - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
dossier | SEC(2008)345 - Commission Opinion under the second paragraph of Article 245 of the EC treaty and the second paragraph of Article 160 of the ... |
---|---|
document | SEC(2008)345 |
date | June 23, 2008 |
29.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 200/20 |
COUNCIL DECISION
of 23 June 2008
amending the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities as regards the rules governing the language arrangements applicable to the review procedure
(2008/621/EC, Euratom)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to Article 64 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice,
In accordance with the procedure laid down in the second paragraph of Article 245 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and the second paragraph of Article 160 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Committee,
Having regard to the request of the Court of Justice of 4 February 2008,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament of 17 June 2008,
Having regard to the opinion of the Commission of 14 March 2008,
Whereas the Rules of Procedure should specify certain detailed rules governing the review procedure laid down in Article 225(2) and (3) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 140a(2) and (3) of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Committee, the principles governing which are set out in Articles 62 to 62b of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice, and, in particular, should lay down the detailed rules governing the language arrangements applicable to that procedure,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
After Article 123, there shall be inserted in the Title headed ‘Title IVa: Review of Decisions of the Court of First Instance’ an Article 123a, to be worded as follows:
‘Article 123a
Without prejudice to the arrangements laid down in Article 29(2)(b) and (c) and the fourth and fifth subparagraphs of Article 29(3) of these Rules, where, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 62 of the Statute, the Court decides to review a decision of the Court of First Instance, the language of the case shall be the language of the decision of the Court of First Instance which is subject to review.’.